3 ms·
2022 does seem reasonable. 2017 and 2019 have been very bad. If they had moved to 64-bit a decade ago when it was obvious that they needed to do so, they would
by thrower123 5y ago
2022 does seem reasonable. 2017 and 2019 have been very bad.
If they had moved to 64-bit a decade ago when it was obvious that they needed to do so, they would have never developed this reputation for being unusably slow and kludgy.
- SantiagoElf 5y agoWorst was 2010, when they tried to switch to WPF or something. It was really slow. The top versions of Visual Studio for me: VS 2022, VS 2008 and VS 2019. The Chief Architect of Visual Studio mentioned on the VS 2022 launch event that they were planning to migrate it earlier, but according to telemetry data - just the past 2-3 years people started to use 64 bit operating systems et mass :) Btw I would love to see percentage of programmers who have families and children broken down by: 1. Ones using IDE like Visual Studio, Eclipse, Rider, etc. 2. Ones using IDE-ish editors like VS Code, Sublime 3. Ones using vim/emacs :)
- jen20 5y ago> according to telemetry data - just the past 2-3 years people started to use 64 bit operating systems et mass This is what happens when you blindly trust telemetry when the target group of a product is the most likely to disable it because of company policy or personal preference.