3 ms·
It's interesting how science-like yt video channels like https://youtu.be/vpwSYQelMEg?t=176 https://youtu.be/vpwSYQelMEg?t=176 make the case that endocarditis i
by Supermancho 5y ago
It's interesting how science-like yt video channels like https://youtu.be/vpwSYQelMEg?t=176 https://youtu.be/vpwSYQelMEg?t=176 make the case that endocarditis is unusually high (let's say 14 of 7.14million), and saying "we don't know what the baseline is but..."
when you can easily look back a few years and look up stats (took me 10 seconds):
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005306 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.116.005306 where baseline is 1/50k^ Any comment to this effect is deleted/unapproved. I can only assume this is the new kind of anti-vax propaganda, to get around yt rules.
^While the instances of vaccine-related endocarditis are relatively high for the 20s to 40s male groups, for children there's nothing to suggest endocarditis is a specific side-effect, afaik.
- 0-_-0 5y agoThat's 1 in 50k person years
- Supermancho 5y ago> That's 1 in 50k person years You are correct. That was helpful clarity. Maybe divide 7.14million by (50000 * 6 year average age or whatever), and you might find a statistical baseline from that? Probably a bad idea. The information is freely available from studies, was more to the point.