4 ms·
Or they could have generational wealth. This whole thing reminds me of the ugliness that was the anti-welfare propaganda of the 70's
by hackcasual 5y ago
Or they could have generational wealth. This whole thing reminds me of the ugliness that was the anti-welfare propaganda of the 70's
- BitAstronaut 5y agoIt could also be that they prioritize their car and have a budget adjusted for it.
- tudorw 5y agothe only Lambo owner I ever met had saved since he was 14 and had nothing else but his car...
- dijit 5y agoJesus christ, even a 16yo Lambo is $100,000 (which is an unthinkable amount of money for a British person on average salary). For context my mums 2 bed house in Coventry was not much more than that, and she's still paying off that mortgage.
- tudorw 5y agoI guess a decade of sofa surfing would just about cover that!
- anovikov 5y agoWhat's wrong about it? I can only praise a person who has generational wealth and doesn't need to work, yet chose the socially beneficial occupation of a social worker (which is neither well-paid nor, let's be honest, well-respected, but necessary job), to do their part?
- sh4un 5y agoIt's all trust. This is what makes this hard, and you can see here no one has experience in this field so everyone has a dumb ass comment. A lot of people regardless of status will still try to have pride. I used to help homeless people and they would often have a lot of trust issues and often prefer to be homeless rather than help. While a social worker may dress up and drive a nice car because they have money, the poor people they are helping don't have trust in them for many reasons. One is that they have nothing, and then they see someone that wants to help and that person is getting richer while they are getting poorer. Same reason people get miffed at donating to the United way only to find out the CEO was making something like 750k a year and asking me to donate 10% of my pay automatically deducted to them. Lol