3 ms·

Apart from the pain around dealing with .NET itself, Bitwarden's official server only supports MSSQL which is a nightmare in pretty much every conceivable way (

Apart from the pain around dealing with .NET itself, Bitwarden's official server only supports MSSQL which is a nightmare in pretty much every conceivable way (licensing, tooling, packaging, and so on). Vaultwarden seems to support plain old Postgres and SQLite.

number6 5y ago
I switched after my instance stock because of a failed migration - this was my fault cause I aborted the upgrade - and I couldn't get it to upgrade anymore. Iam very happy with vaultwarden ever since
seized 5y ago
Bitwarden is working on support of other DBs as well.
ViViDboarder 5y ago
This is the biggest reason for me. I have no problem with .Net and have more experience with C# than Rust, but MSSQL was kind of a deal breaker for me to self host.
e12e 5y ago
> MSSQL which is a nightmare in pretty much every conceivable way (licensing, tooling, packaging, and so on). Licensing, sure. It's more convenient with Free software for small self-hosted instances... But the rest? You can even get a Linux build in a docker container supplied by MS...