3 ms·
Money is basically energy. Having an infrastructure that cost ten time as much money to maintain cost ten time as much energy to maintain. I agree with you, pe
by orwin 5y ago
Money is basically energy. Having an infrastructure that cost ten time as much money to maintain cost ten time as much energy to maintain.
I agree with you, people should understand that their taxes do not pay for debt (usually), that public debt is `good` for their pensions and the economy at large, so the debt isn't an issue. But this is not a trope specific to new urbanists, it is a general trope of people not understanding modern economy. And a lot of old "economist" (Tv economists, not real researchers usually) still believe in this (or use it as a talking point for their own political agenda)
- throwaway0a5e 5y ago>Money is basically energy. Having an infrastructure that cost ten time as much money to maintain cost ten time as much energy to maintain. So at what point is society rich enough to afford it?