3 ms·

So let me get this straight. You think a contract where one party can unilaterally cancel, present no evidence to anyone, and keep the money paid is somehow fa

• unyttigfjelltol 5y ago
  It goes both ways-- do we think a contract with a fixed guaranteed term can be canceled with refund simply because the consumer decided to violate the terms of service? This is what courts are for, and the fact they aren't involved here is the basic problem.
  • LocalH 5y ago
    They should be forced to show exactly why a user is banned. This bullshit about "we don't want to let bad actors game the system" is getting old.
  • llampx 5y ago
    When TOSs can have any looney language in them and are by definition adhesion contracts, I don't see them as particularly sacrosant.