4 ms·
C had years for tooling to be developed. Currently I still prefer C and find Rust to be too strict in parts. But I guess when better tools are available, it cou
by raxxorrax 5y ago
C had years for tooling to be developed. Currently I still prefer C and find Rust to be too strict in parts. But I guess when better tools are available, it could be a decent choice.
But for processors this small I currently could not tell you any advantages to be honest.
- FpUser 5y ago>"But I guess when better tools are available, it could be a decent choice." When / if then sure (assuming it would also be compatible with the megatons of very useful libraries written in C). I would have very little desire to replicate something like LUFA for example.