5 ms·
The sooner they mandate a third does the better. Not sure why this news would lower trust in the government, can you elaborate on that?
by valine 5y ago
The sooner they mandate a third does the better. Not sure why this news would lower trust in the government, can you elaborate on that?
- chiefalchemist 5y agoBecause the promises aren't panning out, and with each stutter step comes another heavy handed proposal (e.g., tracking, vax passports, etc.) In desperation the public has abandoned "trust but verify." Put another way, given the lessons of history, governments should be trusted less, not more. The default shouldn't not be, "Sure, whatever you say."
- mypalmike 5y agoGovernments are adapting to new information. If you expect government policy to be based on an all-knowing oracle, of course you are going to be disappointed.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- chiefalchemist 5y agoIf I said that. If I implied that. Please point it out to me.
- mypalmike 5y agoIt's implied by "government promises". What has your government promised wrt covid? Were such failed promises made in bad faith, or due to the fact that covid is a complex and changing global pandemic without clear answers to anyone?
- chiefalchemist 5y agoIt's not what's said, but what's also said. https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-science-health-pandemics-united-nations-fcf28a83c9352a67e50aa2172eb01a2f https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-science-heal... The current cycle smells like insanity among other things. There are plenty of questions. "What questions?" is not one of them.
- twox2 5y agoGovernments are not known to relinquish control once a new baseline of normal is established... so it does seem that they are adapting to new information only when it serves a certain agenda.
- mypalmike 5y agoMask and other mandates from the Spanish flu era were relinquished once they were no longer needed. Interestingly, paranoia about such things was as common (and wrong) back then at it is now.
- freemint 5y agoI can only talk for my own country but politicians seem to have been really careful to either couple the laws to an state of emergency which is justified by the pandemic situation or do laws which have a certain due date and need to be renewed by Parlament every 6 monthish. Unlike national security against an invisible threat the absence of CoViD can be shown in which case government even if showing the behaviour you suggest can be more easily pressured into doing the right thing.
- throwaway_2009 5y agoSo they "mandate" a third dose, nothing happens long term, so they do a fourth lockdown, close some businesses again, do some travel bans, tell people to put things on their faces, nothing happens long term, so they "mandate" a fourth dose, do a fourth lockdown... And then the virus is still everywhere, it's still significantly more dangerous to be outside than it was in February 2020, and now it's a tremendous administrative pain in the arse to do everything, everyone is terrified due to your big marketing campaign, and we all get it anyway repeatedly. But this time, of course, it'll be different.
- marcosdumay 5y ago> everyone is terrified due to your big marketing campaign Yeah, a lot of people dying tends to terrify people.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- 13years 5y agoThe data has only trended in one direction since the beginning. The response continues to trend in exactly the opposite direction. This is increasing apparent with Omicron.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]