3 ms·
> The title is misleading. Just because you disagree with something does not make it "misleading". The question of prior immunity is not unknown, is an obvious
by timr 5y ago
> The title is misleading.
Just because you disagree with something does not make it "misleading". The question of prior immunity is not unknown, is an obvious question, and in fact is mentioned in the article and discussed in the study.
The title accurately reflects the contents of the study. I have many issues with Washington Post's coverage of Covid, but this is actually fair.
- bluGill 5y agoThat is still misleading. We don't actually have enough evidence to make such bold claims because the unknowns exist.
- timr 5y agoAgain: Just because you disagree with something does not make it "misleading". Your opinion is not truth. No research paper stands alone, and we never have all context on a given question. You disagree with the conclusion for reasons -- that's fine. Make your arguments, and see if you can convince people. That's how science works.