2 ms·
>Then you clearly don't understand the TCO of using a data center vs cloud. The datacenter cost itself isn't the cost - the people who operate it are. I guess
by tw04 5y ago
>Then you clearly don't understand the TCO of using a data center vs cloud. The datacenter cost itself isn't the cost - the people who operate it are.
I guess I find that a bit humorous. I've been architecting solutions that span on-premises and cloud for nearly a decade so I'm intimately familiar with both. I don't actually have a horse in the race. You want cloud, buy cloud, you want on-prem, buy on-prem. But the marketing about one-size-fits-all is EXTREMELY tiresome. And the idea that every single business can or should be moving their entire infrastructure to the cloud is as well.
The fact you imply that somehow you don't need people to manage the cloud makes me seriously question what at-scale deployments you've been a part of. I have yet to see a single enterprise customer save money on staff by moving to the cloud. More often than not what they end up doing is laying off the "tape jockey" and replacing him with an SRE who costs 3x the salary. Congratulations? Now you're paying more for an SRE, and you're backing up to S3 at about 5x the cost of what you were spending on tape? But I guess the 7 years of backups you're legally obligated to keep are more agile?
>If you think cloud computing it's just about a lift and shift from a traditional data center, then you don't understand how to calculate TCO.
I don't think the concept of cloud computing is lift and shift and never said it was. But that's not really relevant to OP's question, what is relevant is what's happening on the ground.
What's actually happening is that most established businesses "moving to the cloud" are lifting and shifting and finding out the hard way. I'm not saying that's what they should do, I'm not saying that's at all a good idea, I'm telling you that is what is happening. And if you think "well they'll mature into a more cloud friendly model" - you're as delusional as their management. What ACTUALLY happens is after they lift and shift and get a year's worth of those bills, they lift and shift the stuff that never should've been in the cloud in the first place back on-premises. Hopefully by that point they've learned their lesson and have a thoughtful evaluation of their applications: re-home, re-write, leave in place.
- mbesto 5y ago> But the marketing about one-size-fits-all is EXTREMELY tiresome. And the idea that every single business can or should be moving their entire infrastructure to the cloud is as well. 100% agree. Didn't mean to imply this. As with anything....it depends.