3 ms·
Gartner has a long history of putting out garbage. Some called them anti-Linux, but I was always in the camp that they were just writing crap for large quantiti
by bachmeier 5y ago
Gartner has a long history of putting out garbage. Some called them anti-Linux, but I was always in the camp that they were just writing crap for large quantities of money and the people paying wouldn't know the difference. This story from 1999 is surprisingly still up: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9910/22/gartner.linux.idg/index.html http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9910/22/gartner.linux.idg/...
> The second report ("1999 OS forecast: The Linux face-off") projects market share in server dollars for the next few years. This one even contains a pretty graphic. The Gartner Group finding is that Linux will fade from the scene following the release of the first service pack for Windows 2000.
> The third report ("Red Hat's future: Boxed in") concludes that Red Hat will fail to overthrow Microsoft by 2004, and suggests that Red Hat needs to find a more viable business model.
- marcosdumay 5y agoThey write what their partners ask them to. If you get a report from them on how the pitfals of setting Oracle's Spatial, it's probably good. If you get a cost benefit comparison of Oracle and Postgres, it's certainly trash. (Who am I kidding? They still insist Postgres doesn't exist.) That said, none of the documents are worth the price you pay and the hassle of interacting with them.