5 ms·
I had an Oreck years ago, I thought it was a good brand, it looked solid, ads made a big deal of it being lightweight and used by hotels...but it didn't suck.
by perl4ever 5y ago
I had an Oreck years ago, I thought it was a good brand, it looked solid, ads made a big deal of it being lightweight and used by hotels...but it didn't suck.
And I thought that's just the way things are.
But I got a Hoover upright, which was much cheaper, looks cheaper, like a toy, mostly garish purple plastic, and is also much heavier. But it sucks up an order of magnitude more dirt. It's bagless, which some people don't like, but it makes it very visible how much crud it's removing and allows it to be dumped after every use.
So I feel like the Oreck was perhaps a swindle, having the looks and characteristics that older people associate with appliances from long ago, except the actual performance.
And I'm glad I didn't spend a lot on a Dyson just to get a vacuum with no bag.
I've never gone there, but I think there's a storefront near me that says they repair vacuum cleaners. Don't recall what kind.
- greedo 5y agoMy Oreck worked great for 18 years, but it did have flaws. I disliked the bags (difficult to change), but it ran like a champ with a lot of abuse. My Miele isn't as light, but does a far better job (and is HEPA compliant). Hopefully it lasts as long as my Oreck.
- imtringued 5y agoI bought a dirt cheap bagless vacuum for 70€. The plastic parts broke off as usual. However, it lasted more than 5 years. I think it still works but I got a bag vacuum now.