2 ms·
The stance that anything that cannot be touched exists only as a reflection of the observer is philosophically interesting, but not much more than that. It dire
by krageon 5y ago
The stance that anything that cannot be touched exists only as a reflection of the observer is philosophically interesting, but not much more than that. It directly stifles communication with almost everyone else and it stops you from seeing harmful behaviour besides. There is, to my mind, very little point to it except as a (fun) thought exercise.
- the_optimist 5y agoI assert less than that, merely that your confidence is significantly overstated, your opinion overfit. The bold, factual, and wrong “there to see” hyperbole renders discourse irrelevant.