>> must notify both the house and senate intelligence committees and get a written sign-off Further, didn't James Clapper lie, in public, under oath in an over

>> must notify both the house and senate intelligence committees and get a written sign-off Further, didn't James Clapper lie, in public, under oath in an oversight committee hearing then admit that he had done so when caught out and face exactly zero legal or career consequences for that flagrantly illegal act? "Must" seems to be open to interpretation meaning something very different to its dictionary definition when this is one, well known and obvious example of how the law is not applied when breached. Is there any real oversight? How would we know?