4 ms·
Never thought I would see the time 4K isn't enough anymore!
by random314 5y ago
Never thought I would see the time 4K isn't enough anymore!
- nickpp 5y ago4K was only ever enough for 24" monitors, where you can use a clean 200% scaling. If you've already moved on to 27" or higher, 4K was never enough!
- akvadrako 5y agoThat's why Apple makes their 27" iMac 5K. 4K is almost enough.
- skohan 5y agoIronically it's not easy to find a current-gen 4k 24"
- newaccount74 5y agoThey stopped selling the Dell UP2414Q! What a shame. So it looks like the only option is the pricy LG Ultrafine 24MD4KL. There's also only a single 5k display on the market (also from LG). It's a shame that there are so few high res displays on the market, and they are all 16:9...
- wilsonnb3 5y agoLG also has the 24UD58 for $300
- lucian1900 5y agoIt wasn't enough to start with for large monitors. High pixel density is important for text readability. A 30" screen at typical monitor distance has very few pixels per arcsecond.
- pembrook 5y agoIt all depends on how close you sit to the screen. What matters is pixel density, and that’s a function of both the resolution and how close you’re sitting. So if you have a 4k TV and a 4k monitor, there’s actually quite a difference. If your monitor is bigger than 24” you’re getting way worse pixel density and visible pixels at the distance you’re sitting. On TVs it’s typically never a problem because you’re sitting far enough away.