3 ms·
> For instance, you send a message back to your collegue to buy a stock yesterday, and you haven't seen him since last Tuesday. So nothing weird would have to h
by tshaddox 5y ago
> For instance, you send a message back to your collegue to buy a stock yesterday, and you haven't seen him since last Tuesday. So nothing weird would have to happen to achieve consistency. Presumably your friend bought the stock, knew not to tell you until tomorrow to give you time to have sent that back to him. If the colleague tried to tell you earlier, something would stop him - because obviously he wasn't able to before you sent the message.
I just don’t see how this works in the extremely simple case where you send the message to your past self. Using the colleague just tries to sidestep this. What physically happens if you attempt to send a message to yourself that you don’t remember receiving in your past? Does the system just consistently malfunction? Does it turn out that you had an accident between receiving and sending that caused memory loss?
- MrYellowP 5y agoWhy can't you just suddenly remember it? It's not like you always, at any moment, remember every single moment of your life. You send it back, and then you remember it. You couldn't have remembered it before you've sent it back, but as soon as you did, you remember reading it. Makes perfect sense to me. I see no reason why the memory wouldn't spontaneously form.
- krageon 5y agoThere are many people that feel many ways about these things, the most obvious way to get answers is to wait for a time machine and do some tests :)
- akimball 5y agoWaiting for a time machine seems like a remarkably inefficient use of the machine