3 ms·
Interesting. How fast can Futhark be compared to a standard CUDA loop with a few arithmetic, load and save operations? Basically, suppose you're doing simple g
by joe_the_user 5y ago
Interesting.
How fast can Futhark be compared to a standard CUDA loop with a few arithmetic, load and save operations? Basically, suppose you're doing simple gathering and scattering?
- futharkshill 5y agoI think it will always be slower than hand-optimized GPU code, just like assembly. But for most complex programs, I think the compiler is better than humans. @arthas, the author, at some point made comparisons against implementations and it was a most twice as slow, but often faster.