3 ms·
If you just hit people with sticks, they are bound to hit back. I don't understand your example.
by kkjjkgjjgg 5y ago
If you just hit people with sticks, they are bound to hit back. I don't understand your example.
- Ensorceled 5y agoI know several people that it would be VERY unwise for almost anyone to attempt to hit them with sticks. Do they get to do larceny as much as they want in this system?
- virgildotcodes 5y agoNo, because in this perfectly rational world a bunch of weaker humans would inevitably band together to overcome the stronger stick man. This is exactly how things would go, which is why in human history warlords have never been a thing, and violent, oppressive men have never built empires.
- catlikesshrimp 5y agoExcept there are still warlords, and drug cartels. And police beating black fellows more often than the average. https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/africas-top-10-dictators-and-warlords-body-count-included/ https://www.thesouthafrican.com/news/africas-top-10-dictator... You need commanders for war. Weaker humans usually sit through decimation until the guards come for them. Then they squeal for help. It is also rational. Consider that if you stand agaisnt the stronger enemy, the enemy might come back later with reinforcements and kill you. Edit: I remembered what the Bible says happened to jews. The egyptians killed the jew children to keep the population in check, before exodus. And shortly after Jesus was born, Herod probably did the same.
- chii 5y ago> inevitably band together to overcome the stronger stick man. and produce the court-based system we see today, with enforcement of the stick centralized to an authority that everyone agreed to (implicitly).