4 ms·
The rest of the population is protected. It's problematic to have both the disillusioned scammed and scammers running around with freshly acquired capital to d
by bluecalm 5y ago
The rest of the population is protected. It's problematic to have both the disillusioned scammed and scammers running around with freshly acquired capital to do more harm to other people.
- rodiger 5y agoThe rest of the population should be made aware of the risks before participating
- bluecalm 5y agoI am talking about people who won't participate like me. It's in my interest to regulate crypto. It's not because I care about people who lose money investing in some nonsense. It's all good, stupidity should have consequences. I do care however about scammers having more capital to conduct more scams in other areas of life or worse yet using it to buy politicians. I also care about the danger of having some % of the population (mainly young men) who just lost everything and won't find a place in society pushing them to crime or marginalized life. I mean those are the same reasons we have to ban pyramid schemes for example - we don't want to have a lot of losers (even if they are dumb losers who entered the scheme on purpose) and unethical now wealthy winners.