3 ms·
"edit: getting downvoted but no explanation why people disagree. I'd love to hear why" Here's one reason: "I look at like how a song might be in public domain
by freejazz 5y ago
"edit: getting downvoted but no explanation why people disagree. I'd love to hear why"
Here's one reason:
"I look at like how a song might be in public domain but that doesn't mean the singers voice is. Likewise for actors vs TV shows."
Singers voices aren't copyrightable. They could be trademarked. You simply just mistake trademarks for copyrights.
- hnlmorg 5y ago> > "I look at like how a song might be in public domain but that doesn't mean the singers voice is. Likewise for actors vs TV shows." > Singers voices aren't copyrightable. They could be trademarked. That's my point ;) > You simply just mistake trademarks for copyrights. No, I'm not. I was talking about the public domain not copyright in that quote. You're the one conflating two things: If something is trademarked but not under copyright then it still isn't in the public domain. Though I will accept some blame because I could have made my post clearer.