> It's not my idea! It's what everyone building software in the last decade has migrated to. Well, everybody besides the biggest free software distributors out

> It's not my idea! It's what everyone building software in the last decade has migrated to. Well, everybody besides the biggest free software distributors out there, which are Linux distributions… > Packaging software so it can be used by any distro's package manager is not viable, and reliance on such an outdated model is why using Linux sucks for everything but writing software to run on a single machine. Yeh, I get it. That's why we need Docker… Nobody is able to distribute software otherwise. Well, except all those "distributions"… > And when they do you almost never go through the official/trusted mirrors because it will never be up to date, you host your own (maybe put up some signature that no one ever checks) so they just sudo apt repository add ; sudo apt-get install -y in your install instructions. Moment. Does this mean someone managed to build packages that work on different versions of even different distributions, which is obviously impossible as we just learned? This starts getting hilarious! I'm sorry for you that nobody want's to listen to your great ideas. Have you ever considered that you're completely wrong?