4 ms·

OK, free at the point of need, but it still needs to be paid for; do you have a suggestion. If countries take the vaccine supplies and then sell them on, what d

OK, free at the point of need, but it still needs to be paid for; do you have a suggestion. If countries take the vaccine supplies and then sell them on, what do we do then -- install a new government so we can get vaccines distributed? What if people won't take the vaccine that came from USA/China/Russia/local state they don't trust, do we somehow force them? I'm for your proposal in the general aspect of it, but how do we take it forward as an actual plan? I still don't think we'll eradicate it, but perhaps with lower levels of community transmission we'll reduce the flare ups of problematic variants?

lemming 5y ago
If the vaccine is free, why would anyone need to sell it on?
- dragontamer 5y ago
  The US government made it free to citizens. But nothing is actually free. When some nation donates 1-million doses, there will be a market value for those doses: maybe $20 million for the batch or so. It's not even black market vs grey market. This is just standard market economies between nations.
- admax88qqq 5y ago
  People will pay to skip the queue, which creates a perverse incentive to hoard and limit distribution to incentive paying. Corrupt officials receiving free vaccine shipments could very well do this.
- pbhjpbhj 5y ago
  I assumed we wouldn't be able to supply 100% of the globe at the same instant, maybe we'd distribute ~20% in a first wave (to the most vulnerable people). That means that those who are rich[er] but don't meet the criteria are going to be in a position to want to buy. If the country/county/area/suburb next door is poor, and a locality has lots of cases then I'm guessing anyone who can afford it has an incentive to acquire a dose of vaccine early, or a booster dose, by buying out someone in that neighbouring locality. You need strong local government without corruption to distribute vaccines fairly.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]

lemming 5y ago

If the vaccine is free, why would anyone need to sell it on?

dragontamer 5y ago
The US government made it free to citizens. But nothing is actually free. When some nation donates 1-million doses, there will be a market value for those doses: maybe $20 million for the batch or so. It's not even black market vs grey market. This is just standard market economies between nations.
admax88qqq 5y ago
People will pay to skip the queue, which creates a perverse incentive to hoard and limit distribution to incentive paying. Corrupt officials receiving free vaccine shipments could very well do this.
pbhjpbhj 5y ago
I assumed we wouldn't be able to supply 100% of the globe at the same instant, maybe we'd distribute ~20% in a first wave (to the most vulnerable people). That means that those who are rich[er] but don't meet the criteria are going to be in a position to want to buy. If the country/county/area/suburb next door is poor, and a locality has lots of cases then I'm guessing anyone who can afford it has an incentive to acquire a dose of vaccine early, or a booster dose, by buying out someone in that neighbouring locality. You need strong local government without corruption to distribute vaccines fairly.

deleted 5y ago

[deleted]