2 ms·
Sorry, but you are making politically charged arguments. I am stating facts. COVID is defeated by Pfizer/Moderna when it comes to an increased background death
by nawgz 5y ago
Sorry, but you are making politically charged arguments. I am stating facts. COVID is defeated by Pfizer/Moderna when it comes to an increased background death rate, i.e. if 100% of the population had Pfizer & Moderna there would be approximately no excess deaths in the population vs pre-COVID times. The remaining issue with the disease isn't so much the people dying from it as it is the fact the unvaccinated population gets very sick and overwhelms healthcare systems, resulting in triage situations that were easily avoidable.
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-by-vaccination#united-states https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-by-vaccination#unite...
- vibrato2 5y agoYet as vaccinations increase, the excess death rate increases
- raxxorrax 5y agoThis data is interpreted wrongly. You need to separate mortality rate by age groups, need to check when cases were recorded, etc. pp. These graphs are more or less useless to draw conclusions from.
- nawgz 5y agoStrongly disagree. I see no bias in vaccine uptake with respect to health outcomes. If anything I would expect the more at-risk to be more likely to be vaccinated, which would skew results towards showing an anti-vaccination result, yet... Measuring COVID cases and outcomes in two unbiased population samples gives a statistically significant result. Please show me why this is false, I would love to know, but I don't see how what you list would introduce bias that would make that graph "more or less useless"