3 ms·
You're missing an important aspect of the lawsuit. Kytch is alleging loss of business due to defamation by McDonald's, be because McDs falsely claimed that the
by Niksko 5y ago
You're missing an important aspect of the lawsuit. Kytch is alleging loss of business due to defamation by McDonald's, be because McDs falsely claimed that the Kytch could harm the Taylor machines.
- Eelongate 5y agoIf Taylor hasn't certified the Kytch product to safely integrate with the Taylor product, it seems reasonable for Taylor to say it could cause problems. If they said it will cause problems, that seems a bit different.
- jamjamjamjamjam 5y agoIt could cause problems to your already broken machine!
- Eelongate 5y agoConsidering they are connected to each other electrically, yes!
- krageon 5y agoNo, because it's already broken. That's the point that was being made and you are not addressing that here.
- HeyLaughingBoy 5y agoYour car's broken: oil pan needs to be replaced and it's in the shop. $2,000 repair. While it's in the shop, it falls off the lift: $10,000 damage. Now your formerly "broken" car is even more broken? Is the situation still the same?
- Eelongate 5y agoWhat sort of argumentation is this? You know full well that something broken in one regard can be further broken in an unrelated regard.
- Chris2048 5y agoHmm. If Kytch will never certify 3rd-party products, isn't it still irresponsible to say it could. The moon could be made of cheese if nobody checks.
- Eelongate 5y agoIrresponsible? I don't know, maybe? What responsibility does Taylor have to Kytch in the first place? Certainly no obligation to say "Their product is safe to use on our machine." Defamatory? I don't think so, but I guess the courts will decide.