2 ms·
Against US based NSO property, practically speaking.
by monocasa 5y ago
Against US based NSO property, practically speaking.
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> US based NSO property, practically speaking Nope. Not only does Israel have an extradition treaty with the U.S., their civil systems are quite tightly linked. [1] https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/07-110-Israel-Extradition.pdf https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/07-110-Isra...
- monocasa 5y agoExtradition has next to nothing to do with a civil EULA suit.
- JumpCrisscross 5y ago> Extradition has next to nothing to do with a civil EULA suit The following has been mentioned elsewhere in the thread. If NSO blows off the EULA suit, they'll be held in contempt of court. That tends to escalate into the type of thing for which one can be extradited.
- freejazz 5y agoThey wont be held in contempt, the court will decide the case in their default. That's what happens when you don't appear for a civil lawsuit.
- monocasa 5y agoYou say that tends to happen, but I can't seem to find a single case where civil no show and non payment escalated to criminal foreign extradition. Do you have any examples of this?