4 ms·

I suggest you read OPs comments more carefully, he is complaining that Amazon is “fraudulently” refunding his orders instead of delivering them when weather per

• Dylan16807 5y ago
  OP is complaining that Amazon is marking the refund as a return when it is not a return. "incase there are sellers that are having to pay return fees" That's the potential fraud part, which makes sense to me. Also, OP is complaining that they are cancelling the shipment in the first place instead of rerouting. That part isn't fraud but it's bad customer service. Also, OP was possibly lied to about item damage, which is really bad customer service.
  • ryanlol 5y ago
    The OP made a direct accusation of fraud with no real evidence to support that claim. > Also, OP is complaining that they are cancelling the shipment in the first place instead of rerouting. That part isn't fraud but it's bad customer service. Cancelling orders in a force majoure situation like this is normal, it’s not bad customer service. Working around this would be exceptional.
    • Dylan16807 5y ago
      > The OP made a direct accusation of fraud with no real evidence to support that claim. The title is imprecise, but it's just a title. The first paragraph of the actual post clarifies that OP is saying if sellers are paying return fees, which is how returns normally work, then it's fraud. > Working around this would be exceptional. An option to delay shipment would not be 'exceptional', and it would not cost Amazon anything notable.