3 ms·
I've found Hugo to be a good option. https://gohugo.io/ https://gohugo.io/
by hnaccount141 5y ago
I've found Hugo to be a good option.
https://gohugo.io/ https://gohugo.io/
- DoctorOW 5y agoHugo is absolutely fantastic and incredibly powerful. It's nowhere near as simple as was requested. It's the most setup of any of the SSGs worth using.
- skrtskrt 5y agoThe biggest issue with Hugo for me was trying to create a custom theme (in order to get a stripped-down site without a bunch of BS), everything breaks if you don't arrange all the files exactly the way required by Hugo themes. Once I got that, and learned some Go templating in the process, it's just markdown files, fire and forget.
- qudat 5y agoAgreed. I have been using hugo for my blog https://erock.io https://erock.io and I still don't completely understand how it works. I just have enough to pattern match on to figure things out
- cpach 5y agoIt does indeed have a bit of a learning curve. IMHO it’s worth the investment, YMMV.
- knuthsat 5y agoI don't find it powerful at all. Very hard to map through structures in templates. Much easier to write templates in a real language. Most of the time I need to map data to something else suitable for rendering. That mapping goes from markdown frontmatter to some nice form. I ended up not using templates at all due to how cumbersome it is to write any kind of data transformations inside the template language. Might as well just generate html myself. A nice example is generating menu contents from a list of menu items with their sort weight and links. Ends up being very cumbersome.