3 ms·
> Cool, then saying someone was 'armed' is extremely meaningless. ‘Armed’ means they were carrying a weapon. That’s not meaningless. How have we come full circ
by teakettle42 5y ago
> Cool, then saying someone was 'armed' is extremely meaningless.
‘Armed’ means they were carrying a weapon. That’s not meaningless. How have we come full circle here?
You’re welcome to disagree with the dictionary, the law, and the rest of the world, but there’s absolutely zero point in us debating your unique, novel, pedantic, and most likely disingenuous position further.
- Dylan16807 5y agoIf fists count as a deadly weapon, which makes someone armed, then calling someone armed is misleading and meaningless because 99% of people are armed. Pointing that out is not disingenuous! And it's not disingenuous for me to earnestly use the definition of weapon I'm being told to use, right? Nobody seems to like my definition of weapon. I swear I'm arguing in good faith.