All I'm saying is... Actually, you've made quite a few claims, including some that even ineffective surveillance is good 'cause it makes criminals worried. But

All I'm saying is... Actually, you've made quite a few claims, including some that even ineffective surveillance is good 'cause it makes criminals worried. But anyway... that I understand why Apple doesn't want CSAM on their servers, while also reserving the ability to implement end to end encryption on photo galleries in future. Given you've admitted Apple's filtering is ineffective, you have admitted that criminals could put CSAM on Apple servers. But weird thing is "end-to-end encryption" is entirely useless if everyone is being surveilled before the start and after the end. Sure, Apple wants to be buzzword compliant with privacy and entirely surveil it's users in reality. I suppose I too can see how that would be appealing.