8 ms·
It's good that the ICIJ is getting this information out there, I just wish they'd stop removing prominent Americans from what they publish.
by frgtpsswrdlame 5y ago
It's good that the ICIJ is getting this information out there, I just wish they'd stop removing prominent Americans from what they publish.
- nobodyandproud 5y agoWould you elaborate? For Americans, this is obviously as important if not more important!
- dewey 5y agoThey are asking them to include the names of American people in the published list.
- kasey_junk 5y agoThey have named some prominent Americans. If they are actively censoring them no one has stated that. People speculate that Americans weren’t large customers of the firms that leaked because a) US tax regime provides less benefit and b) Americans don’t need to go offshore because we have states inshore that provide similar benefits.
- Ansil849 5y ago> I just wish they'd stop removing prominent Americans from what they publish. What is the point of making incendiary comments like this but then not providing any evidence to back them up? Which prominent Americans are ICIJ removing, and from which publications of theirs? And how do you know this? These are all basic things you need to preemptively provide evidence of if you're going to make a claim like this.