3 ms·
>You act as if they're alone in this. > So is that "typical linux"? Where did I mention anything about any other OS practice, or "typical Linux" ? >If not,
by muststopmyths 5y ago
>You act as if they're alone in this.
> So is that "typical linux"?
Where did I mention anything about any other OS practice, or "typical Linux" ?
>If not, why are you throwing MS under the bus?
Jesus man. Mild criticism about an obscure API, of interest to perhaps a literal handful of people, is "throwing MS under the bus" ?
- tw04 5y ago>Where did I mention anything about any other OS practice, or "typical Linux" ? whoosh. You said it was typical Microsoft to not document APIs and implied this is an MS problem. I gave you a direct example IN LINUX and asked you if that's "typical linux"? Because you seem to be saying that the problem is isolated to MS. >Every time I hear someone say "Microsoft has changed", I mutter to myself "nope, same old MSFT with better PR". That isn't "mild criticism about an obscure API" and painting it as such is just farcical.