3 ms·
it does if the software is not working(like in this case). "the legitimate purchaser of a program is entitled to decompile that program in order to correct err
by White_Wolf 5y ago
it does if the software is not working(like in this case).
"the legitimate purchaser of a program is entitled to decompile that program in order to correct errors affecting its operation"
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f5b1193c-f423-4f96-bca5-03f5145ecf15 https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=f5b1193c-f423...
- krageon 5y agoThe main point here is to figure out if it no longer working is actually considered an error or whether it might be a planned feature.
- Mindwipe 5y agoNo, this is misinformation. That ruling just states that it is not a copyright breach to decompile a program to correct errors. It does not grant a carte blanche against other laws. DRM circumvention laws are separate offenses and are not overridden.