3 ms·
Zillow's ambitions were bigger than that. They wanted to get enough inventory so that they could capture the 6% of the transaction going to agents. Plus a chu
by treis 5y ago
Zillow's ambitions were bigger than that. They wanted to get enough inventory so that they could capture the 6% of the transaction going to agents. Plus a chunk of the miscellaneous fees that go to Mortgage brokers, inspectors, appraisers, and so on. For that they needed volume and the way to get volume in real estate is pay more than other people.
I find it hard to believe that everyone there didn't realize that they were burning money. I saw it personally when looking to buy a house a couple years ago. There were a couple Zillow flips out there where the numbers obviously didn't add up. Whether or not they truly believed that it would work eventually or if it was just a way towards higher compensation/promotions/stock price or whatever is anyone's guess. But I suspect pretty much everyone involved from the person banging out ML models up to the CEO knew what was going on.
- lordnacho 5y agoOne thing I thought about is alternative scenarios. If the house market had rocketed up for whatever reason, Zillow could have made a pile of cash without having a sensible strategy. Then the articles would be talking about what geniuses they were and ML trampling traditional real estate. They would double down and when the market calmed, all the same issues would reappear. Perhaps that's actually what happened, because the house market has been buoyant recently, and they seem to have had the iBuyer business for a few years?
- htrp 5y agoStartup mentality right? Lose money on each unit and make it up on traction.....