3 ms·
It is not reliable, for sure, and we don't know by what factor or which way the error goes. It might show ten times the real number, or half the real number. T
by pbak 5y ago
It is not reliable, for sure, and we don't know by what factor or which way the error goes.
It might show ten times the real number, or half the real number. That would be either 1'700 people or 34'000 dead in the US alone.
I wouldn't discount the lower limit either, 1'700 is still a lot and far from a small risk.
- Daishiman 5y agoYou've essentially admitted it's an unreliable source that can be complete fiction for all we know. It's not validated by any medical institution, no one has jumped to defend it, none of the claims can be independently validated. I might as well just take my pandemic advice from a radio talk show host.