3 ms·
I disagree. Yes the law is the law and he should not have raped her, but she also should have had the moral fortitude not to then get into an affair with him.
by secondaryacct 5y ago
I disagree. Yes the law is the law and he should not have raped her, but she also should have had the moral fortitude not to then get into an affair with him.
The guy checks all the boxes, and will have to be punished, but giving the appearance of a scorned mistress doesn't help her convince something so wrong happened a decade ago.
But, no need to be perfect to he heard, and she'll have to have her chance.
- krageon 5y ago> she also should have had the moral fortitude not to then get into an affair with him. > giving the appearance of a scorned mistress doesn't help her convince Given that we are certain both of those things can exist together, the case must at least be investigated. People should not have to be punished (or disbelieved) for being what they are: imperfect beings.
- posterboy 5y agoGP: > "Is it normal?" just sounds like you saying "it isn't normal, she did something bad", almost putting the guilt on her. You: > I disagree. Also you: > she also should have had the moral fortitude not to ... This seems to be a contradiction, unless you disagree on some metalevel, disagreeing with the course of events in general.