5 ms·
> You are responsible for making yourself happy, for asserting yourself, for setting any boundaries you choose. People on Twitter can just block, or mute, or tu
by KittenInABox 5y ago
> You are responsible for making yourself happy, for asserting yourself, for setting any boundaries you choose. People on Twitter can just block, or mute, or turn off their DMs for people they don't follow.
This solution does not account for the following ways a troll can harass you:
* sockpuppets pinging you,
* sockpuppets impersonating you,
* sockpuppets mass reporting you, thereby suspending your accounts
* finding people you are friends/family with and sending them rape/death/bomb threats or doing the above,
* finding where you work and sending your workplace similar threats,
* putting up websites involving your legal name and face to make allegations you're a child predator/criminal optimized for search engines.
- concinds 5y agoIt might seem callous, and it might be (and I know some people have poor mental health at times and social media onslaughts won't help) but my solution is to not let things affect me. If Viktor Frankl could do it in death camps, I think it's something everyone can rely on. You can also become the heel, become the "villain", and use that abuse to gain influence rather than lose it; most social media abuse is unjustified so there's nothing unethical about this. The alternative is having people go to jail or get a suspended sentence because they insulted J.K Rowling in a tweet.
- KittenInABox 5y agoHonestly I like to hope there is a middle ground between "insulting a public figure is grounds for jailtime" and "sending constant rape and bomb threats to non-public figures and all of their family for years on end is a perfectly legal thing to do that people should just get used to, I mean, if someone could endure literal genocide someone else should endure constant threats to their and their social circle's safety".
- raxxorrax 5y agoYou are without a doubt a public figure if you put yourself on social media. Many people have warned against oversharing and have stated that people will want regulation when they get exposed to the negative side, the reason why PR agencies exist. But these laws would affect everybody.
- mdp2021 5y agoSurely there must be independent legislation against at least part of that behaviour.
- Levitz 5y agoHonestly half of that is already illegal and the other half is more of a problem with how social media fundamentally works. The idea of making laws so someone doesn't spam pings is preposterous.