3 ms·
"Am I overlooking something?" Oh, how clever. Using the "no" oriented questions already. I see what you are doing.
by bulbosaur123 5y ago
"Am I overlooking something?"
Oh, how clever. Using the "no" oriented questions already. I see what you are doing.
- ignoramous 5y agoThings just got meta.
- contingencies 5y agoAll possible successor states of any state. - Leslie Lamport, via https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup https://github.com/globalcitizen/taoup
- Aeolun 5y agoGod, I just realized how hard they’re going to claim how much their company is discussed on the web.
- lstamour 5y agoRight, they should have been inspired by something less generic… like the alphabet - it worked for Google and Amazon (the logo has an arrow from A to Z). Feels like Meta is just as generic in that it can be used to describe everything.
- ZephyrBlu 5y agoWhat about "no" orientated questions? I tend to ask questions like this, but have never read Chris Voss' book.
- abdabab 5y agoIf you still didn’t get it, you just used a method that Chris Voss recommended in his book.
- ZephyrBlu 5y agoI picked that up, I'm wondering what's special about "no" orientated questions and why he recommends them. Or are you talking about my comment? In that case I'm quite confused. E: ok this is amusing. I found this article: https://blog.blackswanltd.com/the-edge/how-to-get-buy-in-starting-with-no https://blog.blackswanltd.com/the-edge/how-to-get-buy-in-sta.... - Ask a "no-orietated" question - Go silent (Effective pause so they can answer) - Follow-up with a calibrated "what" or "how" question - Repeat as necessary This feels very similar to my default communication style, so it's funny to see it documented like this.