2 ms·
Maybe, but there are a lot of factors that drive IPO decision making and I don't think this would be a huge one. It's not only traded on established securities
by ncallaway 5y ago
Maybe, but there are a lot of factors that drive IPO decision making and I don't think this would be a huge one.
It's not only traded on established securities market, it's also "readily available on secondary markets".
Basically, if there's a significant number of shares trading hands between parties on an ongoing low-friction basis it's going to be subject to the tax rules. Which means a company that wants to have a really large pool of investors wouldn't be able to skirt this by just not listing.
I think this law could affect the number of IPOs at the margins, but I suspect it wouldn't be the fundamental consideration for a lot of companies.
I think if this law was paired with one that treated putting shares as a collateral for a loan as a taxable event (that is, if you use your shares as the collateral for a loan, those shares are taxed as capital gains at the value that they were assigned as collateral) it would mitigate most of the "IPO avoidance" concerns, since another primary tax avoidance strategy would also be shut down.
- seanmcdirmid 5y agoThere are lots of factors that drive IPO decisions, preferable treatment on capital gains is definitely one of them. You become taxed merely for holding shares (as a sort of share deprecation), then you won't do that if you have better options, so they will flock to better options. Building a private company is something they can do much more easily than anyone else, why wouldn't they? The complete avoidance of shares would then make the tax law meaningless.