> Is there disagreement that legal matters should allow for full disclosure whether criminal or civil? Yes, I don't agree with this. > Is the problem [...] to

> Is there disagreement that legal matters should allow for full disclosure whether criminal or civil? Yes, I don't agree with this. > Is the problem [...] too much access without legal justification? That is also a problem, which isn't new (it existed in the time you described in the opening of your post as well). > Only with court order the keys are released and your devices get opened up? This doesn't work (and we know it doesn't, there's so many times it failed already because of systemic issues with the idea), so as a hypothetical it only serves to distract from the fundamental truth that it cannot be a solution. > I do get the government mass surveillance aspect [...] But [...] we lost that battle With that mindset, you have indeed lost :)