3 ms·
The problem with this line of thinking is that it presupposes the surveillance is justified. It isn't. The practical objection is that you have no recourse if
by mulmen 5y ago
The problem with this line of thinking is that it presupposes the surveillance is justified. It isn't.
The practical objection is that you have no recourse if you are focused on. So it's a numbers game. One that we shouldn't be playing.
You say most of us. How many innocent lives are you willing to destroy in the quest to vanquish an imaginary foe?
- connordoner 5y agoI hear you, loud and clear. I don’t know where the balance lies, truth be told, because I can see both sides to the argument.
- krageon 5y ago> I can see both sides There is the side that says "we should know everything, because we own you" and the side that says "I prefer not to be owned". There is no good-faith way to see both sides of that, that is just avoiding a hard question because it is convenient.