3 ms·
That's all standard in a patent litigation and is by far the least expensive element of what you'd be paying an atty to do. That is to say, it's basically trivi
by freejazz 5y ago
That's all standard in a patent litigation and is by far the least expensive element of what you'd be paying an atty to do. That is to say, it's basically trivial to get an atty to say that you should contend invalidity via a counterclaim (especially in light of how §101 is treated lately). What costs is getting an atty to actually find the invalidating prior art, draft up the counterclaims, etc.
- tyingq 5y agoSorry, I'm confused. If Altair Logix sues some other party, for the same patent, why is this linked list of invalidating prior art and counter claims not useful in reducing cost?
- Talanes 5y agoThis is what I got from reading your comment: Least Expensive Element: Invalidating prior art, counterclaim documents. Actually Cost Money: Invalidating prior art, drafting counterclaim documents.
- freejazz 5y agoWell that's because you neglected the part where the Least Expensive Element is an attorney telling you that those things should be done, not atually doing them.