4 ms·
Unless you work and sell your labor "at-cost", you are also "profit-seeking". It does not mean that you are also "unethical". Profit-seeking should not imply u
by rglullis 5y ago
Unless you work and sell your labor "at-cost", you are also "profit-seeking". It does not mean that you are also "unethical".
Profit-seeking should not imply unethical, no need to twist language when there is already the vocabulary to convey the proper meaning.
- amelius 5y ago> Profit-seeking should not imply unethical Nobody said that profit-seeking implies unethical. It was said that profit-seeking companies should not deserve our unconditional trust.
- yazantapuz 5y agoNobody is saying that they deserve unconditional trust neither.
- pixelgeek 5y ago> Unless you work and sell your labor "at-cost", you are also "profit-seeking". Well the last time I checked I didn't turn a blind eye to my work helping to start a promote a genocide in Burma so I really don't see your point. I don't think that profit-seeking ever results in behaviour that is ethical. If I make a decision based on my desire for more money then it is almost always going to be a choice not based on ethical or moral values. The difference is the scale. If I cut a few corners as a independent contractor then at worst my client gets slightly less value from their money. If I cut corners as the owner of a chain restaurant then my profit-seeking has an impact on the employees I have and my customers. If I am a major corporation that has billions of users then my profit-seeking has incredible impact.
- rglullis 5y agoYou are using profit-seeking to convey the (immoral) idea of "favoring profits over ethics", while I am using the more (ammoral) neutral definition of "doing something for financial gains". Can we agree to that? If so, you'd have to argue why you want to change a neutrally-charged concept into something that carries negative connotations.