4 ms·
People in this thread say variations of your comment, that it's obvious, that everyone knows it. But then at the same time people still make excuses for compan
by 2pEXgD0fZ5cF 5y ago
People in this thread say variations of your comment, that it's obvious, that everyone knows it.
But then at the same time people still make excuses for companies like Facebook. They urge others not to assume any bad (or purely profit oriented) intent, to believe that the people working at Facebook are honest about what their PR campaigns and Zuckerberg claim and the list goes on...
Also it is absolutely common that people really want to give companies the benefit of the doubt when it comes to morals vs. profit.
So it's clearly not that obvious to most, it's just that people agree if you phrase it the way this headline does.
Also still everyone does the dance of company marketing and "mission statements". Quotes like "we here at <generic megacorp> want to make the world a better place" are still often taken at face value or repeated outside the work environment.
It's not clear, or if it is, most still play along.
- Aeolun 5y agoSomething, something, Wizard’s First Rule. People will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- ravitation 5y agoI find it very interesting the number of people in these comments making the simple claim that companies are often (at least often enough to be relevant) primarily motivated by things other than profit. That's not even what neoliberals argue. The more compelling, but still not that compelling, argument is that certain types of profit maximization (usually long-term, "pro-innovation" profit maximization) inherently result in outcomes (maybe net outcomes) that align with pro-social (i.e. good for society) motivations.