4 ms·

Along with Fable highly recommend a look at Feliz. A joy to work with and its ViewEngine can also separately be used w/ Giraffe just for the syntax: https://z

by kirse 5y ago

Along with Fable highly recommend a look at Feliz. A joy to work with and its ViewEngine can also separately be used w/ Giraffe just for the syntax: https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/Feliz/ https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/Feliz/ https://github.com/Zaid-Ajaj/Feliz https://github.com/Zaid-Ajaj/Feliz

ilaksh 5y ago
Does Feliz work with Fable?
- pharmakom 5y ago
  Feliz is an F# library designed to be used with Fable
sbelskie 5y ago
For those interested in Svetle, Sutil is another thing to check out. Top of my head I can’t remember if it is based on or just inspired by Feliz. https://github.com/davedawkins/Sutil https://github.com/davedawkins/Sutil
- djdjgd 5y ago
  It's inspired heavily by Svelte itself, and borrows the Feliz DSL for building DOM. Feliz itself is a layer on top of React, Sutil is ground-up raw DOM building.
eatonphil 5y ago
> optimized for happiness I like React and I like F#. But I never understand this kind of marketing. It's not that I want things optimized for pain. But I guess I'm just most interested in the technical choices and actual performance in the domain over my own happiness?
- headphoneswater 5y ago
  I'd imagine the folks who take up these projects require f# everywhere in their lives to obtain happiness
- isaacabraham79 5y ago
  Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns. Unless you meant something else there?
  - eatonphil 5y ago
    I mean that the marketing around "happiness" doesn't directly address any concerns that developers should have when evaluating a library. At best it's indirect if you assume that happiness means performance, but that's a big assumption. So I'd rather marketing just say exactly what it's direct goals are rather than indirect ones like happiness. > Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns. But as a particular point, this is hard to believe. TS tries to have no (or a minimal) runtime component whereas F# definitely must have a major runtime component.
lf-non 5y ago
Zaid Ajaj probably has had the biggest impact in establishing the Fable/F# ecosystem. Besides his numerous repos, the Elmish book [1] is really awesome. [1] https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/the-elmish-book/#/ https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/the-elmish-book/#/
- xupybd 5y ago
  Zaid Ajaj is prolific to say the least. I can't believe the number of F# tools he has created.

by kirse 5y ago

ilaksh 5y ago

Does Feliz work with Fable?

pharmakom 5y ago
Feliz is an F# library designed to be used with Fable

sbelskie 5y ago

For those interested in Svetle, Sutil is another thing to check out. Top of my head I can’t remember if it is based on or just inspired by Feliz. https://github.com/davedawkins/Sutil https://github.com/davedawkins/Sutil

djdjgd 5y ago
It's inspired heavily by Svelte itself, and borrows the Feliz DSL for building DOM. Feliz itself is a layer on top of React, Sutil is ground-up raw DOM building.

eatonphil 5y ago

> optimized for happiness I like React and I like F#. But I never understand this kind of marketing. It's not that I want things optimized for pain. But I guess I'm just most interested in the technical choices and actual performance in the domain over my own happiness?

headphoneswater 5y ago
I'd imagine the folks who take up these projects require f# everywhere in their lives to obtain happiness
isaacabraham79 5y ago
Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns. Unless you meant something else there?
- eatonphil 5y ago
  I mean that the marketing around "happiness" doesn't directly address any concerns that developers should have when evaluating a library. At best it's indirect if you assume that happiness means performance, but that's a big assumption. So I'd rather marketing just say exactly what it's direct goals are rather than indirect ones like happiness. > Since the F# transpiles into JS at runtime it's really no different than, say, TS in terms of performance concerns. But as a particular point, this is hard to believe. TS tries to have no (or a minimal) runtime component whereas F# definitely must have a major runtime component.

lf-non 5y ago

Zaid Ajaj probably has had the biggest impact in establishing the Fable/F# ecosystem. Besides his numerous repos, the Elmish book [1] is really awesome. [1] https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/the-elmish-book/#/ https://zaid-ajaj.github.io/the-elmish-book/#/

xupybd 5y ago
Zaid Ajaj is prolific to say the least. I can't believe the number of F# tools he has created.