5 ms·

Regarding the last article on Pokimane and streaming, IMO as soon as you reach a certain celebrity the deliberate trolls and haters will inevitably come along.

Regarding the last article on Pokimane and streaming, IMO as soon as you reach a certain celebrity the deliberate trolls and haters will inevitably come along. It is admirable how most of the streamers handle this well, but as the article states being in such a position is bound to leave some scars. I wonder if that is more or less true for streamers than other forms of celebrity.

AussieWog93 5y ago
I don't think it's the fault of the streamers' fame as much as it is the broader gaming community's tolerance of people with absolutely no empathy, social skills or basic human decency[1]. My wife and I make most of our income sell used games online, and regularly receive tirades of abuse from our customers when their expectations are not met. We have been deliberately pivoting our marketing away from core gamers and towards the casual crowds, in fact, partly for this reason. My old manager, who moved from being an indie game dev to a "regular" programmer, had similar stories - most notably an angry customer who personally messaged his wife with a string of nasty accusations because they disagreed with some particular design choice. I understand that there is some kind of funnel effect that contributes to this, in the sense that people who are hated by their peers will spend more time engaging in solitary activity. I still don't understand why the community tolerates and even encourages toxic behaviour, though. [1] I am not talking about the nervous aspie who struggles to make smalltalk; I am talking about the people who sent obscene messages to Neil Druckmann because they didn't agree with some of the choices he made when designing The Last of Us 2.
- bsenftner 5y ago
  I was a Lead Dev for EA Sports for a while. The obsessed gamers will locate your email and/or phone and harass you, accusing of some personal conspiracy to ruin the game for them, or some other convoluted nonsense. It was surprising at first, and then a deluge of harassment. One of the many, many reasons I left that corrupt to the core shit show of an industry.
- 5560675260 5y ago
  I don't think that there is any meaningful gaming community, same way as there is no overarching communities for movie watchers or music listeners. At this point it's just a type of content we consume, art we appreciate, etc. But despising Neil Druckmann and his storytelling is a cultural touchstone and something people can connect and form community around.
- Jensson 5y ago
  > I don't think it's the fault of the streamers' fame as much as it is the broader gaming community's tolerance of people with absolutely no empathy, social skills or basic human decency[1]. What would you suggest they do? As long as you play games and post about them online you are a part of the gaming community, it doesn't have the power to exclude anyone. The problem is just that you have a lot of very opinionated customers in gaming. Customer support hates opinionated customers in every field, not just games, they just have more of them in gaming, and even more the more "hardcore" gaming you get. There is nothing you can do about that, gaming as a medium has potential to create way stronger emotional connections than any other medium and the customer support woes scales directly with that. Games that creates less emotional connections has fewer issues as you say, but people who makes games people connect stronger with will always face issues. The Last of Us was one such game, people really connected with it and then when the sequel didn't turn out as they wanted a lot of people reacted extremely strongly. But the rest of the gaming community can't do anything about that, if a million gamers hated Niel Druckmann then they will post about it, create forums about it, and some of them will harass him, just like any other huge emotional mob.
- bsanr2 5y ago
  There was a semi-deliberate effort to reshape ideas about programming in the 60s and 70s, as awareness of its coming importance was rising. The most infamous of these changes was, of course, the shift from the perception of programming being simple clerical work for female secretaries to prestigious knowledge work for men diverted from math and physics academia. There was also, however, a shift from the perception of programming being a highly collaborative (and soft skill-sensitive) administrative and professional process, to one where a lone genius or small group of whiz kids in fly-by-night circumstances (garages, rented office space, etc.) drove productivity and innovation. Tin foil hat time: I'd wager that this was itself driven by the rise of the microcomputer and the coming-of-age of people whose first experiences programming were on the home PC, instead of in a college course or on-the-job. This would be during a time where computing skills were discounted if not maligned; there may have developed a sort of culture of reactionary pride (and the sensitivity to rejection and humiliation that accompanies passionate, personal investment in an identity) as a result, without the controls of business etiquette.

AussieWog93 5y ago

I don't think it's the fault of the streamers' fame as much as it is the broader gaming community's tolerance of people with absolutely no empathy, social skills or basic human decency[1]. My wife and I make most of our income sell used games online, and regularly receive tirades of abuse from our customers when their expectations are not met. We have been deliberately pivoting our marketing away from core gamers and towards the casual crowds, in fact, partly for this reason. My old manager, who moved from being an indie game dev to a "regular" programmer, had similar stories - most notably an angry customer who personally messaged his wife with a string of nasty accusations because they disagreed with some particular design choice. I understand that there is some kind of funnel effect that contributes to this, in the sense that people who are hated by their peers will spend more time engaging in solitary activity. I still don't understand why the community tolerates and even encourages toxic behaviour, though. [1] I am not talking about the nervous aspie who struggles to make smalltalk; I am talking about the people who sent obscene messages to Neil Druckmann because they didn't agree with some of the choices he made when designing The Last of Us 2.

bsenftner 5y ago
I was a Lead Dev for EA Sports for a while. The obsessed gamers will locate your email and/or phone and harass you, accusing of some personal conspiracy to ruin the game for them, or some other convoluted nonsense. It was surprising at first, and then a deluge of harassment. One of the many, many reasons I left that corrupt to the core shit show of an industry.
5560675260 5y ago
I don't think that there is any meaningful gaming community, same way as there is no overarching communities for movie watchers or music listeners. At this point it's just a type of content we consume, art we appreciate, etc. But despising Neil Druckmann and his storytelling is a cultural touchstone and something people can connect and form community around.
Jensson 5y ago
> I don't think it's the fault of the streamers' fame as much as it is the broader gaming community's tolerance of people with absolutely no empathy, social skills or basic human decency[1]. What would you suggest they do? As long as you play games and post about them online you are a part of the gaming community, it doesn't have the power to exclude anyone. The problem is just that you have a lot of very opinionated customers in gaming. Customer support hates opinionated customers in every field, not just games, they just have more of them in gaming, and even more the more "hardcore" gaming you get. There is nothing you can do about that, gaming as a medium has potential to create way stronger emotional connections than any other medium and the customer support woes scales directly with that. Games that creates less emotional connections has fewer issues as you say, but people who makes games people connect stronger with will always face issues. The Last of Us was one such game, people really connected with it and then when the sequel didn't turn out as they wanted a lot of people reacted extremely strongly. But the rest of the gaming community can't do anything about that, if a million gamers hated Niel Druckmann then they will post about it, create forums about it, and some of them will harass him, just like any other huge emotional mob.
bsanr2 5y ago
There was a semi-deliberate effort to reshape ideas about programming in the 60s and 70s, as awareness of its coming importance was rising. The most infamous of these changes was, of course, the shift from the perception of programming being simple clerical work for female secretaries to prestigious knowledge work for men diverted from math and physics academia. There was also, however, a shift from the perception of programming being a highly collaborative (and soft skill-sensitive) administrative and professional process, to one where a lone genius or small group of whiz kids in fly-by-night circumstances (garages, rented office space, etc.) drove productivity and innovation. Tin foil hat time: I'd wager that this was itself driven by the rise of the microcomputer and the coming-of-age of people whose first experiences programming were on the home PC, instead of in a college course or on-the-job. This would be during a time where computing skills were discounted if not maligned; there may have developed a sort of culture of reactionary pride (and the sensitivity to rejection and humiliation that accompanies passionate, personal investment in an identity) as a result, without the controls of business etiquette.