I don't think the claim is dodgy at all. She advocates for a governmental body consisting of former social media employees to act as a content control mechanism

I don't think the claim is dodgy at all. She advocates for a governmental body consisting of former social media employees to act as a content control mechanism. That is dodgy, extremely so. Maybe she did work on censoring tools and was held back by management, who knows, but it is still dodgy. Maybe I am lost in translation here, but I think it extremely sketchy.