That second rebuttal doesn't seem too strong: regardless of what the point of the proposal was, the concern to address was that in practice there doesn't seem t

That second rebuttal doesn't seem too strong: regardless of what the point of the proposal was, the concern to address was that in practice there doesn't seem to be interoperability. Consider one of the mentioned successes: > Dozens of VC-capable mobile wallet apps are now available in the app stores—the vast majority of which support at least one type of DID. If most of them support just one or a few types, that doesn't sound like interoperability to me - especially if they all support different types? (I should note: I know almost nothing about DIDs, so interpret this as a question rather than an indictment.) Although I don't think public reasoning for Google's and Apple's stances are available, the "real reasons" section sounds very conspiratorial: even if you consider the stated reasons misguided, that's no reason to assume that those who made the argument believe them.