I did not take the comment in the same light. I think it is great that people are creating such software. Seems useful for many users. But looking at the broad

I did not take the comment in the same light. I think it is great that people are creating such software. Seems useful for many users. But looking at the broader context npteljes has a point. Why fight an insecure tool (let's say Windows is insecure for the sake of the argument, I do not have a strong opinion about it) then patch the security on top. Surely the obvious choice is to stop using the insecure tool. Sometimes people want a technical answer, when the answer is to do the obvious. I don't think that is pessimism.