4 ms·
IANAL, but FB never made any direct or implied promise in its EULA that you could mass unfollow everything, and there probably ARE terms against scripting their
by lr4444lr 5y ago
IANAL, but FB never made any direct or implied promise in its EULA that you could mass unfollow everything, and there probably ARE terms against scripting their API in an unauthorized way, so I don't think there is a case.
- kwhitefoot 5y agoAny EULA agreement is between Facebook and the End User not the creator of a Chrome plugin. If they have a case it is against the individuals who use the plugin.
- matheusmoreira 5y ago> FB never made any direct or implied promise in its EULA that you could mass unfollow everything Why does this have to be explicitly allowed? Everything not prohibited is permitted. > there probably ARE terms against scripting their API in an unauthorized way The extension is not bound by any terms. It's the user's choice whether to violate these conditions by installing and using it. In any case, users should have every right to do this. It's essentialy self-defense against corporate abuse. They can get us addicted to content feeds so we spend hours looking at ads but we can't script their site? That's abuse and we have every right to defend ourselves. These stupid terms are like a drug dealer that makes us promise not to go to a doctor and seek help for addiction before giving us our free sample.
- TechBro8615 5y agoIf Facebook tells me I can only browse their website in Google Chrome, then can they sue me if I open Facebook in Mozilla Firefox?
- amelius 5y agoEULA doesn't mean anything as it's a one-sided contract. It doesn't allow the user to provide their terms in an input field. So it can't be taken seriously. It's basically 10,000 employee company against single consumer. No judge would think that is a fair way to go about these things.