4 ms·

So nothing changed with the source code or its licensing, only the location on github? That seems a bit inconsequential, tbh. Are there strings attached to the

So nothing changed with the source code or its licensing, only the location on github? That seems a bit inconsequential, tbh. Are there strings attached to the new location? If no, then move on.

kevin_b_er 5y ago
You'd not say the same thing if the ownership of a domain changed hands quietly, in the background.
- quickthrower2 5y ago
  That would be worse though. This is like a subdomain changing hands quietly. E.g. you mypage.github.io.
ethbr0 5y ago
Per post, being part of a GitHub Enterprise organization grants the GEO's owners control over any projects contained in that organization. That's the change.
- flowerlad 5y ago
  Thank you. That does seem consequential.
  - oaiey 5y ago
    Yeah and is not wrong for the foundation and the projects. It is the absolute lack of community, communication and tone deafness.
    - robmen 5y ago
      Exactly.
heavyset_go 5y ago
There were also pull requests that were merged despite maintainers' objections to merging.
- robmen 5y ago
  That didn't happen to me and there was a pretty comprehensive (IMHO) apology about that issue.
arvindamirtaa 5y ago
There are strings attached to the new location - the maintainers can (in theory) be kicked out of their own repositories.